Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance
Friday, June 29th, 2007Every year the National Biodiesel Board conference is shadowed by grassroots biodiesel activists, and every year we all end up inspired and wanting to form an organization to keep the inspiration alive.
Last year everyone converged in San Antonio at the Sustainable Biodiesel Summit, where it was pretty much business as usual. The organizers, Rachel, Sara Hope, Emily et al drew in some major star power and put on a great show.
And at the end, instead of wishing we could actually do something with our message of sustainability, Daryl Hannah and Kelly King announced they were going to launch an effort to come up with a Sustainable Biodiesel Label.
We applauded their efforts, and all went home, got immersed in our unsustainable lives, and forgot about it. One day in the spring I got a call from a reporter with Biodiesel Magazine and did an interview about my take for sustainable biodiesel. I thought nothing of it. Biodiesel Magazine is not known for its journalism. Its known for glossy advertisements and pass-thru press releases, and I have always thought of it as the editorial arm of the National Biodiesel Board. I did my tired old usual spiel and forgot about it.
Which is why I was somewhat taken aback when I got a call from Heidi Quante, the director of the Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance in San Francisco. She read the article, and was wanting me to serve on the production practices panel which is tasked with writing up guidelines for what may become a Sustainable Biodiesel Certification.
Wow. They have a working feedstock group, a production practices group, and an eye on marketingthe works. This is a group that is doing some work, even before it has a website in the world. Normally its the other way around: nice website, no action in the world.
And they are planning a Hard Rock Café kickoff fundraiser in New York City in the fall.
Remarkable.
Bob King from Pacific Biodiesel fired off a skeleton of what sustainable production practices might look like, his framework in bold, and before vanishing into my new Southampton hideout, I fired this across the bow:
Transportation
Efficient transportation from feedstock source
This could be measured in BTUs per pound, which would be impacted by transportation type, fuel type, and miles traveled. When we haul our feedstocks on B100, for instance, we should get a higher score than if we are hauling on petroleum. Those on water should get more points than those on rail, which should get more points than those on truckbut mileage would also need to play a role. One plant might be able to truck in feedstock from 100 miles away and use less BTUs per pound than another that is shipping in from the other side of the world.
Those on waste products should score higher than those on virgin. Even though Uncle Sam treats waste chicken as virgin from a tax perspective, it should score higher from a BTU perspective.
Im seeing a calculatorlike those carbon footprint websitesor a scoring system of some kind.
Efficient transportation to end user
This could be BTUs per gallon shipped. Same thing as incoming. Presumably the plant selling its product to consumers in the yard would get a higher score than one loading product on trucks to ship to bulk plants for blending.
Environmental
Control of fugitive emissions of methanol from process
Control of methanol emissions in waste products
Emissions from boiler exhaust
Correct transportation and use of glycerin byproduct
Waste water disposal
Absorbent disposal
Plants with methanol recovery should score higher than those without.
Glycerin going to the boiler fuel market (methanol in) should score higher than glycerin going to dust suppression methanol in. Again it ties back into BTU consumption. BTUs consumed should get a higher score than BTUs composted.
Energy
Renewable fuel source for heat
Renewable source for electricity
Overall energy efficiency of process and office
I think we should also look at embodied energy of plants. Those who recycle existing facilities into biodiesel plants should score higher than those plants built on green fields. Those who built reactors out of existing tanks should fare better than those who fabricate new.
Its a shame Piedmont might not qualify for a sticker
Feeling like I had made a contribution, I headed to New York. Then I noticed John had posted a Green Fuel Index on the Biofuels Interest Group (BIG) list, and it dawned on me that I ought to invite the readers of Energy Blog to jump in on this process.
What would sustainable production practices look like to you? And as an aside, would it matter if your biodiesel supplier carried a Sustainable Seal of Approval?
I would be delighted to hear your take on these ideas.
Original post by Lyle