Archive for the ‘Legislation’ Category

CSIRO to report on alternative fuels mid-2008

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008

A

Original post by Nathan

Greens to major parties: let’s oil-proof Australia

Tuesday, October 16th, 2007

Senator Milne, from the Australian Greens. Image from the Australian Greens. The Greens have announced today a comprehensive alternative fuels policy as part of their election campaign push. The Greens Climate and Energy spokesperson, Senator Christine Milne, called on Prime Minister John Howard and Opposition leader Kevin Rudd to develop a comprehensive strategy for “oil-proofing” Australia.

The central tenet of the policy is a significant shift over the next four decades to replacing 90% of Australia’s petrol use with electrified vehicles (with the power generated from renewable sources) and second-generation biofuels such as cellulosic ethanol, with an interim target of 10% biofuels use by 2020.

“The Australian Greens have been warning for years that the twin challenges of oil depletion and climate change mean we must wean ourselves off oil by moving to less polluting alternatives,” Senator Milne said today in a press release. “Through the campaign we will release more policies including: boosting public transport funding; increasing investment in clean, alternative fuels; helping shift freight from road to rail and sea and replacing tax incentives to private car use with carbon-based taxes.”

“The Government and Opposition are promoting policies that will make the problem worse by locking us in to more roads, artificially cheaper fuel and even more polluting alternatives like coal-to-liquids.”

We’ll be covering every party’s alternative fuel policies as they’re announced in the lead-up to the November 24 federal election, so keep an eye out for more news on this front. With climate change headlining the election issues and the price of oil putting more pressure on the economy, alternative fuels may yet form a major part of any party’s election promises.

(Source: Australian Greens)

Original post by Nathan

Australia may lose out in European car battle

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

Arguments between European car manufacturers and the European Union could result in further delaying imports of cleaner cars into Australia, including a variety of “clean diesel” vehicles.

The European Union has set a vehicle emissions target of 130 g of CO2 per km for its manufacturers by 2012, but auto makers says it’s “not feasible” and would add A$4100 to the cost of every car, potentially forcing them to move production outside of the Union. Adding to this potential delay is the reluctance of the European auto industry to import its clean diesel vehicles to Australia, where the quality of diesel is less of that in Europe. Australian diesel still has a relatively high level of sulfur, though this will drop from January 1, 2009 from 50 parts per million to 10 parts per million, in line with the upcoming Euro V regulations.

Speaking at the Frankfurt auto show, Fiat chief executive Sergio Marchionne said that car makers supported the EU legislation, but needed more time to achieve the targets. “Lead time is a common practice around the world. The Government of Japan agreed on new CO2 requirements with the car industry last year which will result in average emissions of 138 grams of CO2 per kilometre from 2015,” he said.

“The best solution to reduce CO2 emissions from cars and to safeguard jobs and investments in Europe is an integrated approach, combining further improvements in vehicle technology, an increased use of alternative fuels, improved infrastructure and traffic management, a more economic driving style and harmonised CO2-related taxation.

“This requires a partnership involving the automotive industry, the fuel industry, policy makers at all EU government levels and consumers.”

(Source: The Age)

Original post by Nathan

Australia needs to improve its diesel fleet: expert

Sunday, August 12th, 2007

An old diesel pump, from http://flickr.com/photos/yvettiefred/225841445/. Licenced under CC 2.0. With sales of passenger diesel vehicles increasing rapidly, some are raising concerns about the potential health hazards that diesel emissions can pose. Although Europe and the United States both have quite strict diesel particulate regulations, Australia has not yet caught up in both technology and regulations.

Associate Professor Vishy Karri, from the School of Engineering at University of Tasmania, says that Australia is in danger of falling behind global trends in reducing diesel emissions. “I would love to see Australia put strict regulations in place. In my opinion we are lagging behind and should be acting on these things sooner rather than later,”&nbsphe said in an interview with the Mercury.

Although sulphur content in diesel fuel (the primary cause of particulate and smog emissions) has been greatly reduced from 500 parts per million to only 50 ppm in the past year, with a further reduction to the upcoming European standard of 10 ppm planned for 2009, the primary source of potentially dangerous emissions is not cleaner new passenger vehicles, but an ageing road transport fleet that is responsible for over 70% of diesel fuel consumption in Australia. A recent report by the National Environment Protection Council has stated that the individual states need to assist in improving the emissions of the diesel truck fleet through the use of particulate filters and oxidisation catalysts.

Alternatively, Dr Karri has supported the use of biodiesel to reduce emissions in any diesel vehicle. Biodiesel decreases almost all types of emissions, with the exception of NOx, and is produced from renewable sources in Australia such as canola. According to Dr Karri, “there are some staggering figures that show hydrocarbons and greenhouse gas emissions are significantly reduced, even with 2 per cent biodiesel mixture into diesel.” Despite a lack of warranty support from manufacturers, most diesel vehicles need no modification to run even pure biodiesel.

(Source: Mercury)

Original post by Nathan

WA minister supports E85

Tuesday, July 31st, 2007

Photo by The West AustralianWestern Australia is setting itself up to rival Queensland as Australia’s ethanol state, if recent events are anything to go by. The submission by industry to WA’s biofuels taskforce has recommended the introduction of an E85 fuel standard, which would combine 85 per cent ethanol with 15 per cent unleaded fuel. Currently the ethanol content of fuel is capped at 10 per cent by federal regulation.

WA state minister for agriculture, Kim Chance (pictured), is supportive of the biofuels industry in Western Australia.

“There is a great potential in WA for alternative fuels such as biodiesel and ethanol to provide significant benefits in both environmental and economic terms,” he said.

“I believe one of the most important benefits a biofuels industry in WA will provide is the boost to rural economies and an increase in employment opportunities.”

Mr Chance recently had the opportunity to drive a Saab 9-5 BioPower, currently the only flex-fuel vehicle available in Australia. He is also likely to support a mandate for minimum biofuel content in all WA fuel, likely a 5 per cent ethanol blend.

“That will be the key issue that Government will be considering, I can feel reasonably confident the Government will be supporting the other recommendations, but the issue of target and mandate around 2010 and 2011 will engender some lively discussion,” he said recently.

E5 is suitable for almost all vehicles, while E85 can only be used in vehicles that have properly modified fuel systems.

(Sources: Farm Weekly, ABC online, The West Australian)

Original post by Nathan

Carbon trading - how it affects the alternative fuels market

Tuesday, July 24th, 2007

Lonsdale St power station in Melbourne, photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/mugley/311948163 Earlier this month, Prime Minister John Howard announced his plan for a carbon trading market for Australia, to be introduced no later than 2012. The programme aims mainly at Australia’s worst polluters - such as electricity producers and select areas of industry - but also allows for low-emission businesses to benefit by selling their carbon allocation to heavier polluting businesses, ideally encouraging the growth of low-emission industries. But how does this affect the alternative fuels industry in Australia?

(more…)

Original post by Nathan

What’s next for Australia’s auto industry?

Wednesday, July 18th, 2007

 Speculation abounds in the wake of Ford’s announcement that they will be closing down engine operations at their Geelong plant by 2010. Government, unions and industry are all keen to have their say on what this means for the future of Australian-built cars.

From an alternative fuels point of view, Labor has been the first to jump in and put its weight behind developing locally built low-emission vehicles through its Green Car Partnership program, for which it has pledged $500 million and asked the car industry to match it on a one-to-three basis, bringing the total pool to $2 billion. The ALP program aims to develop low-emission vehicles in Australia through through a variety of avenues such as clean diesel, hybrids and flexible fuel vehicles. Labor leader Kevin Rudd has also promised to fast-track a review of the automotive industry and implement it within three months of being elected. Joining Mr Rudd was Kim Carr, the Shadow Minister for Industry, who came out swinging in an editorial in today’s Australian newspaper who attacked the Coalition government for not helping the automotive industry adapt to a changing marketplace and outlined the ALP’s plans to help Ford develop a local line of more efficient vehicles.

The industry and various unions also put some of the blame for the plant closure at the government’s feet, with Victorian AWU secretary Cesar Melham saying the Federal Government should step in and help the industry as a matter of national interest.

“It’s very grim for the automotive industry if a company like Ford closed down its engine operation, if a company like Ford failed to invest in new technology, where we’re talking about diesel engines, smaller engines, hybrid cars - it’s looking very grim,” he said.

In addition, AMWU secretary Dave Oliver is calling on the Federal government to convene an “urgent summit” for the automotive industry to look at the challenges facing it in the future.

So what does this all mean for the future of more efficient Australian cars? While both the Federal Opposition and unions support Ford and other car-makers moving towards hybrids and other cleaner technology, neither the Federal Government nor the automotive industry have have signalled that they plan to make any significant steps towards that end. The move to use imported V6 engines is better for the environment (as it meets upcoming Euro IV standards), but not so much for the local industry. It seems only time will tell whether the industry listens to public demand for more efficient, cleaner cars.

UPDATE 19/7: Ford Australia President, Tom Gorman, has ruled out the possibility of creating a locally-produced hybrid at Ford in the near future, but says that the use of low-pollution combustible fuels such as LPG, ethanol and diesel are possibilities.

(Sources: news.com.au, ABC News)

Original post by Nathan

Democrats say Ford engine woes a green opportunity

Monday, July 16th, 2007

fordgeelong

There is a lot of publicity in the media currently about Ford Australia’s potential decision to shut down engine production at its Geelong plant, as the products currently being made there will not meet the impending Euro IV emissions regulations. No final decision has been made yet, but public figures including Democrats leader Lyn Allison are urging Ford to consider retooling their Geelong operations to construct more environmentally friendly engines.

“Hybrid and alternative fuel technologies are the way of the future, and exist in Australia right now,” she said.

Senator Allison also called on the Howard government to assist in the development and public acceptance of low-pollution cars such as electric vehicles, pointing to the CSIRO and Holden joint venture that produced the E-Commodore.

Although it would be ideal to see a major Australian manufacturer taking the lead on alternative fuels or more efficient vehicles, retooling an entire plant to deal with a new type of powertrain is a big ask, especially for a company that posted a $40 million loss for 2006. Other competitors such as Holden aren’t in a much better position, however, so this could be the opportunity Ford needs to differentiate itself in a market where “staying the course” has seen profits tumble in the light of changing consumer needs.

(Source: IBN News)

Original post by Nathan

Perth gets hybrid taxis

Sunday, July 8th, 2007

Toyota Prius taxi in NYC, from http://flickr.com/photos/moth/245573404/

Western Australia is set to be the third Australian state to trial hybrid taxis, with the state government offering a $15,000 grant and up to 20 per cent reduction in the vehicle lease rates for up to 10 hybrid taxis. Planning and Infrastructure Minister Alannah MacTiernan said that, combined, the vehicles would emit 410 tonnes less CO2 over an eight-year lifespan when compared to standard taxis such as the six-cylinder Holden Commodore or Ford Falcon.

Hybrids are well-suited to urban driving where idling and frequent start-stopping is common, making taxis an ideal candidate. New York City in the United States is planning to convert their entire fleet to hybrid vehicles, and the vehicles are also being trialled in Townsville and Sydney. Unfortunately the WA government is likely to be limited in the variety of vehicles to be offered as part of the grant application process, with only two hybrids being sold in Australia currently that would suit the role: the Toyota Prius and the Honda Civic Hybrid (there is also a third hybrid available, the Lexus RX400h, but at about $95,000 each it’s unlikely to be racking up the kilometres as a taxi). The programme may be extended if it is judged to be successful, but no time frame was given for a wider introduction of the hybrid vehicles.

(Source: PerthNow)

Original post by Nathan

Analysis: Australia’s future fuel

Wednesday, July 4th, 2007

If you’ll indulge me for a moment, I’d like to take the opportunity to step back from each individual step that we’ve been focusing on here to take a look at the broader perspective.

In 2005, Australia consumed:

    - 18,712 million litres of petrol (15,856 ML of which was used in passenger vehicles)
    - 8690 million litres of diesel fuel (5,636 ML of which was used in rigid or articulated trucks)
    - 1564 million litres of LPG/CNG fuel

Current indicators are that fossil fuel use has increased in the 18 months since this data was recorded; alternative fuel use in transport was not significant enough to appear with these statistics at the time. In terms of fuel production:

    - Non-renewable fuel production has increased 446% in the last 30 years
    - Renewable fuel has increased 28% in the same period

Clearly these are not the markers of a country that has embraced alternative and renewable fuels, as much of the world is doing. This is both a weakness and an opportunity for us: although we have so far given up the chance to be a world leader in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, we have been able to observe a very rapidly maturing field of fossil fuel replacements and make a sensible decision about which is best for the Australian environment. If you’re interested in knowing who the primary contenders are, read on.

(more…)

Original post by Nathan

No love for hybrids in Australia

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2007

Toyota Prius, taken from http://flickr.com/photos/simonk/535063371/

If the latest motor vehicle sales figures are anything to go by, Australia has a long way to go to clean up its act on the roads, both on the supply and demand sides. The year-to-date statistics show that just 0.5 per cent of all vehicles sold were hybrids, and 62 per cent of those vehicles were bought by governments. On a positive note, the trend for hybrids is upwards, with the past month seeing the most hybrid vehicles yet sold in Australia (380).

Why are hybrid sales so sluggish in Australia when compared to other parts of the world? There are a variety of factors that play into it, not the least of which is a lack of incentives from state and federal government to buy more efficient cars, making them a more expensive purchase than in other countries. Coupled with concerns about battery life and misconceptions about the “true” environmental cost of manufacturing, as well as a lack of variety on the supply side, it’s little wonder that most of Australia has yet to see the value in them. Given the limited market, are we likely to see an Australian hybrid on the roads any time soon or will our auto companies deem it too risky an investment?

(Sources: Courier Mail, Australian Bureau of Statistics)

Original post by Nathan