Alternative fuel vehicle sales for November 2007
Wednesday, December 19th, 2007A
Original post by Nathan
A
Original post by Nathan
As strange as it might sound, running your car on iron filings might be a possibility in the future, if researchers at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States have their way.
WA Planning and Infrastructure Minister Alannah MacTiernan has visited the Tennessee-based research facility recently to try and find a clean alternative to fossil fuels. Ms MacTiernan is not completely convinced that current alternatives such as ethanol and diesel are truly viable replacements for petrol in Australia, and as such is scouting out potential solutions.
Oak Ridge’s potentially revolutionary fuel, which uses iron powder rather than traditional gas or liquid fuel, utilises nanotechnology to create very fine particles that combust at lower temperatures than larger particles. The nanoparticles can be burned using existing combustion engine technology (much like regular vehicles) at a much lower cost than other alternatives such as fuel cells, but with a higher efficiency than petrol. David Beach, the head of ORNL’s Materials Chemistry Group that has pioneered the research, says that the fuel could drive vehicles three times further than conventional petrol, and can be stored at ambient temperature and pressure safely.
“We have performed experiments with iron nanoparticles about 50 nanometers in diameter,” Beach says. “These nanoparticles are partially oxidized to develop a 2-nanometerthick oxide coating that keeps the particles from spontaneously combusting. With the oxide coating, which we measured using X-ray diffraction, a temperature exceeding 150°C is required to make the particles ignite. We measured the peak combustion temperatures of these particles, the ignition temperature, and the extent of the reaction. Then we determined the products of the reaction.
“In our radiometry experiment we measured the iron nanoparticles’ peak combustion temperature, which is 1100 Kelvin,” Beach continues. “The temperature should be hot enough to achieve high energy efficiency but not so high that exotic materials, such as expensive ceramics, are required to contain the combustion. Cast iron can be used as the combustion chamber for nanostructured metal fuels.”
The powder fuel, which may also potentially be made out of boron, could also be used in gas turbines such as those found on aircraft, providing a potential safe future fuel for aviation as well as land-based vehicles.
Meanwhile, we hope that Ms MacTiernan continues to search for viable alternative fuels such as this and brings some of the best ideas back to Australia.
(Source: ORNL via The Australian)
Original post by Nathan
Western Australia is setting itself up to rival Queensland as Australia’s ethanol state, if recent events are anything to go by. The submission by industry to WA’s biofuels taskforce has recommended the introduction of an E85 fuel standard, which would combine 85 per cent ethanol with 15 per cent unleaded fuel. Currently the ethanol content of fuel is capped at 10 per cent by federal regulation.
WA state minister for agriculture, Kim Chance (pictured), is supportive of the biofuels industry in Western Australia.
“There is a great potential in WA for alternative fuels such as biodiesel and ethanol to provide significant benefits in both environmental and economic terms,” he said.
“I believe one of the most important benefits a biofuels industry in WA will provide is the boost to rural economies and an increase in employment opportunities.”
Mr Chance recently had the opportunity to drive a Saab 9-5 BioPower, currently the only flex-fuel vehicle available in Australia. He is also likely to support a mandate for minimum biofuel content in all WA fuel, likely a 5 per cent ethanol blend.
“That will be the key issue that Government will be considering, I can feel reasonably confident the Government will be supporting the other recommendations, but the issue of target and mandate around 2010 and 2011 will engender some lively discussion,” he said recently.
E5 is suitable for almost all vehicles, while E85 can only be used in vehicles that have properly modified fuel systems.
(Sources: Farm Weekly, ABC online, The West Australian)
Original post by Nathan
Fairfax media’s automotive section, Drive, has released an online once-off publication called the Green Motoring Guide, available as a free download. As you might expect, it’s largely drawing from previously published articles (this is made particularly clear where editing has made some parts nonsensical) and won’t give much new information to anyone who is a regular to this site or has simply done some of their own research, but it’s a concise and reasonably accurate introductory guide to the green automotive options available today (and a short discussion on future options). The guide focuses mostly on getting the most out of your existing vehicle and what to look for in a new “greener” car, from the size to the fuel source.
Overall, it is probably worth a read if you want a brief guide to immediately available options for reducing your fuel consumption and emissions, but do your own research and be aware that all journalism, especially when it comes to forecasting technological trends, has an inherent bias (even us, but we admit it - we’re biased towards clean fuels). There’s more to the alternative fuels story than can be covered in one magazine.
Note: The GMG has an error on page 6 regarding the energy content of ethanol fuel. Pure ethanol contains approximately 65% of the energy of unleaded petrol, or about 21 MJ/L (the exact content varies depending on the production source and process). E10, which is 10 per cent ethanol and 90 per cent unleaded petrol, has a proportionally higher energy content - about 3% less than standard RON 91 unleaded.
Original post by Nathan
Earlier this month, Prime Minister John Howard announced his plan for a carbon trading market for Australia, to be introduced no later than 2012. The programme aims mainly at Australia’s worst polluters - such as electricity producers and select areas of industry - but also allows for low-emission businesses to benefit by selling their carbon allocation to heavier polluting businesses, ideally encouraging the growth of low-emission industries. But how does this affect the alternative fuels industry in Australia?
Original post by Nathan
Speculation abounds in the wake of Ford’s announcement that they will be closing down engine operations at their Geelong plant by 2010. Government, unions and industry are all keen to have their say on what this means for the future of Australian-built cars.
From an alternative fuels point of view, Labor has been the first to jump in and put its weight behind developing locally built low-emission vehicles through its Green Car Partnership program, for which it has pledged $500 million and asked the car industry to match it on a one-to-three basis, bringing the total pool to $2 billion. The ALP program aims to develop low-emission vehicles in Australia through through a variety of avenues such as clean diesel, hybrids and flexible fuel vehicles. Labor leader Kevin Rudd has also promised to fast-track a review of the automotive industry and implement it within three months of being elected. Joining Mr Rudd was Kim Carr, the Shadow Minister for Industry, who came out swinging in an editorial in today’s Australian newspaper who attacked the Coalition government for not helping the automotive industry adapt to a changing marketplace and outlined the ALP’s plans to help Ford develop a local line of more efficient vehicles.
The industry and various unions also put some of the blame for the plant closure at the government’s feet, with Victorian AWU secretary Cesar Melham saying the Federal Government should step in and help the industry as a matter of national interest.
“It’s very grim for the automotive industry if a company like Ford closed down its engine operation, if a company like Ford failed to invest in new technology, where we’re talking about diesel engines, smaller engines, hybrid cars - it’s looking very grim,” he said.
In addition, AMWU secretary Dave Oliver is calling on the Federal government to convene an “urgent summit” for the automotive industry to look at the challenges facing it in the future.
So what does this all mean for the future of more efficient Australian cars? While both the Federal Opposition and unions support Ford and other car-makers moving towards hybrids and other cleaner technology, neither the Federal Government nor the automotive industry have have signalled that they plan to make any significant steps towards that end. The move to use imported ͢ engines is better for the environment (as it meets upcoming Euro IV standards), but not so much for the local industry. It seems only time will tell whether the industry listens to public demand for more efficient, cleaner cars.
UPDATE 19/7: Ford Australia President, Tom Gorman, has ruled out the possibility of creating a locally-produced hybrid at Ford in the near future, but says that the use of low-pollution combustible fuels such as LPG, ethanol and diesel are possibilities.
(Sources: news.com.au, ABC News)
Original post by Nathan
There is a lot of publicity in the media currently about Ford Australia’s potential decision to shut down engine production at its Geelong plant, as the products currently being made there will not meet the impending Euro IV emissions regulations. No final decision has been made yet, but public figures including Democrats leader Lyn Allison are urging Ford to consider retooling their Geelong operations to construct more environmentally friendly engines.
“Hybrid and alternative fuel technologies are the way of the future, and exist in Australia right now,” she said.
Senator Allison also called on the Howard government to assist in the development and public acceptance of low-pollution cars such as electric vehicles, pointing to the CSIRO and Holden joint venture that produced the E-Commodore.
—
Although it would be ideal to see a major Australian manufacturer taking the lead on alternative fuels or more efficient vehicles, retooling an entire plant to deal with a new type of powertrain is a big ask, especially for a company that posted a $40 million loss for 2006. Other competitors such as Holden aren’t in a much better position, however, so this could be the opportunity Ford needs to differentiate itself in a market where “staying the course” has seen profits tumble in the light of changing consumer needs.
(Source: IBN News)
Original post by Nathan
Since the story was first published, we’ve had a lot of interest in Melbourne’s Conservo petrol station. Conservo markets itself as a “green” service station, offering biofuel blends and organic products. For people looking to find it and take a look for themselves, the service station is located in High St, Prahran, near Swinburne University. Read on for more details of what it offers and some photographs.
Original post by Nathan
If you’ll indulge me for a moment, I’d like to take the opportunity to step back from each individual step that we’ve been focusing on here to take a look at the broader perspective.
In 2005, Australia consumed:
Current indicators are that fossil fuel use has increased in the 18 months since this data was recorded; alternative fuel use in transport was not significant enough to appear with these statistics at the time. In terms of fuel production:
Clearly these are not the markers of a country that has embraced alternative and renewable fuels, as much of the world is doing. This is both a weakness and an opportunity for us: although we have so far given up the chance to be a world leader in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, we have been able to observe a very rapidly maturing field of fossil fuel replacements and make a sensible decision about which is best for the Australian environment. If you’re interested in knowing who the primary contenders are, read on.
Original post by Nathan