Today I am off to NC State to participate in a symposium entitled The Energy Situation, Public Deliberation and Social Innovation.
Here is what I am going to say:
Six years ago, when I was a student at Central Carolina Community College in Pittsboro, there was a popular phrase being bandied about Washington D.C.-and that was “Regime Change.”
I latched on to the term and when we published a flyer for a renewable energy course I was to teach, we called for “Energy Regime Change.”
It felt radical. The price of a barrel of oil was about 30.00, and the United States was sounding the drums of war in Iraq.
A small group of us had stumbled into making biodiesel out of waste vegetable oil. By now you all know what biodiesel is. It’s that cleaner burning renewable fuel that is made from fat and can run in any unmodified diesel engine.
At the time we were collecting used cooking oil from various dumpsters in the Triangle, bringing it home to my back yard, and attempting to spin it into fuel. At the time it did seem a little Rumplestiltskinesque-but we were pulling it off-by hook and by crook.
It was one thing for me to meet the fuel needs of my tractor. It was another matter to fill up Rachel’s Dodge. And Leif’s Dasher. And Tami’s Jetta. And so on. We formed Piedmont Biofuels as a Coop where members could participate in meeting their own fuel needs.
And we talked about it. We wrote blog entries and speeches and books and we pushed our stories out to the world. David Korten tells us that when we change the stories, we change the culture.
And we are happily guilty of that. We became the largest biodiesel Coop in America. With around 600 members, it is a position Piedmont Biofuels holds to this day.
We found ourselves in the energy business-shipping valuable BTUs around to members who needed them. And when you are moving BTUs around you become conscious of all of your energy inputs.
So you deploy solar panels. And you enact conservation. You daylight your facilities. And you study gravity. And you become keenly aware of coal fired electricity. And before long you are immersed in topics that have nothing to do with making biodiesel.
If you are not careful, you become a renewable energy guru.
I once attended a talk by the head of Larry’s Beans. That’s a fair trade, organic, shade grown, bird safe coffee roasting operation in Raleigh. The gist of his talk was about how their addiction to sustainability overtook their interest in the coffee business.
At Piedmont Biofuels we have been converting fossil BTUs into renewable BTUs for six years. And the process has caused us to spawn two sustainable farms, a non-profit, a statewide curriculum, a consulting business, an education business, a design-build business, and a research and development arm.
Long after they stopped looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, we were opening our Industrial biodiesel operation which currently kicks out about a million gallons of biodiesel a year. By then we had changed our mantra from ‘Energy Regime Change” over to “Hometown Security.”
Since we are in the energy business it would be logical to measure us by our energy balance-that is-how many fossil BTUs we consume versus how many renewable BTUs we generate.
Academic researchers say that biodiesel made from virgin soybean oil has an energy balance of 1:3.2. That is, 3.2 renewable BTUs are generated from every fossil BTU consumed. When studying virgin soy we need to account for the sins of pesticides and herbicides and electricity for crushing etcetera.
A graduate student study of our Coop operation yielded a 1:7 result. Because we run around on one hundred percent biodiesel in our collection efforts, and the Coop begins at the dumpster. That is-most of the energy is charged to the French fry, and we begin after it has been fried.
I don’t have a number on our industrial operations but I suspect it would be somewhere in between the two. Since we run on locally generated chicken fat, we will likely clobber virgin soy, but we are unlikely to perform better than our Coop brethren. This fall we hope to enlist N.C. State’s help on getting an energy balance for our industrial operation.
While it is utterly critical for us to focus on the carbon footprint and energy balance of our fuel, it is equally interesting to take a look at lunch.
We have a good-sized kitchen at our biodiesel plant. And we have a tradition we call “Local Food Friday,” in which volunteer teams of people prepare food for everyone on project.
That means that around 12:00 on any given Friday, you will find farmers, and educators, and fuel making interns, and fuel makers, and accountants, and farm interns, and researchers, and guests converging for a sit down meal that generally accommodates 30-40 folks.
And if you are not around for Local Food Friday, you might very well find yourself at Oilseed Potluck on Sunday nights. Oilseed community is a cluster of residences that is populated by folks “on project.” Once again the dinner table is filled with volunteer board members, and farmers, and educators, and biodiesel production workers, and others who have a relationship to the greater project.
Those who are not able to attend Oilseed Potluck, may very well find themselves dining at the Coop, where a community of interns, and farmers, and neighbors, and farm interns has coalesced into a social fabric of its own.
What began as making fuel has morphed into making friends, and the “making friends” part has outstripped the importance fuel production.
Nowadays the conversation is about Ultimate Frisbee (that’s Wednesday nights) or disc golf (every Saturday night at 6:00) or the new band in town, or the pecan harvest, or who fell in love with whom.
The fact that we are all employed somehow in the production of renewable BTUs is secondary. It’s beside the point.
An energy regime change is our start point. That is why we are here. And while we are all working toward it, we might as well hang together.
Imagine four competitive men on the edge of a catfish pond, staring down a disc golf basket. Each has taken their turn to “drive,” which means throwing the disc as far as they possibly can. And each has worked themselves into a position to “putt,”” or throw their discs into the basket.
One is a grower. He powers his farm with homemade biodiesel, and makes a living selling sustainable produce to eaters in Raleigh. He is good at driving and putting, which makes him hard to beat at disc golf.
One is a teacher. He has worked for years in the biodiesel industry in far away places like Hawaii and Texas, and he has chosen the path of the leather elbowed blazer. He’s moved to town in part because he thinks it would be a good place to weather a total and complete economic meltdown. He has a wide repertoire of disc golf shots and is hard to beat.
One is a new kid. He lives for disc golf and biodiesel. And has moved to town from Michigan to complete the Biofuels Program at Central Carolina Community College. He has become the primary fuel maker at Carolina Biofuels over in Durham. He has come with a collection of golf discs, a large variety of shots, an unstoppable ability to putt, and he is hard to beat.
The fourth is me. I’ve barely heard of disc golf. But I’m the guy who created the catfish pond. I do the entire course with a single borrowed disc and am pretty much a one trick pony when it comes to throwing styles. I’m a founder of Piedmont Biofuels, know a whole lot about the industry, and I am not hard to beat.
If you ask this foursome whether or not they are social innovators they might reluctantly agree. They are sustainability addicts. Renewable fuel is one thread that ties them together-but they don’t talk about it all that much.
At the end of the day each is doing what they can do to reduce their carbon footprint, and to help others do the same. Each is there to win a round of disc golf. Or at least to experience the thrill of a few beautiful shots.
No one on our project has any delusions about replacing the energy density of fossil fuels with biofuels. We cannot replace what we take from within the earth’s crust with that which we can scrounge from the earth’s surface. And with that in mind we all realize that what we are doing is merely demonstrative.
We are drawn as much to the shared meals as we are to the BTUs.
And speaking of meals, did you notice I used “scrounge” when describing our feedstocks for biodiesel? The reason I chose that word is that is connotes waste, and I think that when it comes to biodiesel it is best to stay in the waste stream for our feedstocks.
Biodiesel doesn’t normally win when it bids for feedstocks against those in the food supply, and I would argue that we don’t want to win that one. When we first started making biodiesel it was considered “quirky.” As the notion grew in popularity to became known as “good,” and when our big brother, ethanol, figured out how to out-compete food supplies, we found ourselves labeled by the United Nations and others as “evil.”
In times of caloric surplus, turning food into fuel looks like a good idea. In times when the world’s caloric consumption is evenly matched with its caloric output, biofuels look like a rotten idea indeed.
I’ve been good. I’ve been evil. Good is better.
We started out using waste vegetable oil. We moved to virgin soybean oil. We switched to waste chicken fat, and back to waste vegetable oil, and back to chicken fat again. I’ll settle for calling our efforts “mostly good.”
Our industry cannot always make the same claim. We must not flatten the rainforest to grow oil palm all in a row to put it on supertankers to ship the oil to America to spin it into fuel in Seattle’s harbor, ship it to Raleigh by the rail car only to wait until RDU airport has burned enough of it to the point we give them an award fro being “green.”
Stop the madness.
And the same can be said when we sell our fuel to Europe. We kill ourselves to make sustainable biodiesel out of local feedstocks. We innovate to reduce our water consumption, we crack our co-products to reduce waste, we try and we try and we try.
But at some point, we need to rip the “sustainable fuel” sticker off the product. And we can argue about where that might be. It could be the state line. Or the Georgia harbor. Or the fuel terminal in Rotterdam. All we know for sure is the guy in Oslo filling up on fuel made in Pittsboro cannot call himself “green.”
Madness, it seems, can go both ways.
For us sustainability is simple. It entails putting a little more into the pot than we take out of the pot. And once you wed yourself to that idea, you rapidly realize that sustainability can only be achieved by a dramatic reduction in consumption. The path to a sustainable energy future lies in conservation.
Finally, the important thing to realize is that our primary relationship to energy is mediated by its price, and the price we assign energy has very little to do with markets, and everything to do with society’s values.
Let’s say a gallon of diesel fuel is 3.50 at the pump in Raleigh today. Not included in that price is the price of the health care associated with its use. If the user were required to pay for the asthma and respiratory problems associated with the product’s use-add a buck. In America we have decided that we will not pay for our health care at the pump. We’ll pay that through our health plan at the office.
Not included in that 3.50 product is the price of war. We get to pay for that every April 15th when we send our taxes to Uncle Sam. Even in “peace time” the United States maintains a vast military infrastructure in the countries of the Persian gulf. But we don’t pay for that “security” at the pump. Add another buck.
Not included in that 3.50 product is the price of climate change. As we watch our property insurance premiums climb, we are inclined to gripe about the high price of fuel. Were we to tie the cost of climate change to the use of the product, add another buck.
The energy industry has done such a wonderful job of externalizing its true costs, and society has done such a marvelous job of absorbing those costs elsewhere, that the average consumer is oblivious. They just hope the next administration can get fuel prices down.
I notice Steve Kalland is on the dance card today. Renewable energy is a small pond, and I’ve had the pleasure of sharing the stage with Steve before. He’s my hero. I can’t wait to hear what he has to say-but I am confident there is something he will not say.
He will not say that the Utilities Commission of North Carolina is so wedded to cheap electricity and so dependent on successful externalities that it needs to be burned to the ground. He will not say that the state could afford to give every North Carolinian with a solar orientation free solar panels to generate as much electricity, for less money than the cost of a new nuclear plant.
The price of energy is a societal decision. Where it comes from and how we harness it is dictated by its price. In cultures where energy prices have been allowed to rise, renewable energy rapidly takes up its rightful role. In North Carolina, where industry comes to live out its last few last years before moving to the developing world to die, cheap energy is at the heart of our thinking.
We need to change that story. And when we do, we can change the culture.
Original post by Lyle